Entries Tagged as 'Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method (ATAM)'

Using Scenario-Based Architecture Analysis to Inform Code Quality Measures

Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method (ATAM) , Technical Debt 1 Comment »

By Robert Nord,
Senior Member of the Technical Staff
Software Solutions Division

(This blog post was co-authored by Ipek Ozkaya)

Robert Nord As the pace of software delivery increases, organizations need guidance on how to deliver high-quality software rapidly, while simultaneously meeting demands related to time-to-market, cost, productivity, and quality. In practice, demands for adding new features or fixing defects often take priority. However, when software developers are guided solely by project management measures, such as progress on requirements and defect counts, they ignore the impact of architectural dependencies, which can impede the progress of a project if not properly managed. In previous posts on this blog, my colleague Ipek Ozkaya and I have focused on architectural technical debt, which refers to the rework and degraded quality resulting from overly hasty delivery of software capabilities to users. This blog post describes a first step towards an approach we developed that aims to use qualitative architectural measures to better inform quantitative code quality metrics.

Read more...

Reflections on 20 Years of Software Architecture: A Presentation by Linda Northrop

Architecture , Architecture Documentation , Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method (ATAM) , Quality Attribute Workshop , Reflections on Software Architecture , Ultra Large Scale Systems 4 Comments »

By Bill Pollak,
Transition Manager
Research, Technology, & System Solutions

Bill PollakA search on the term "software architecture" on the web as it existed in 1992 yielded 88,700 results. In May, during a panel providing a 20-year retrospective on software architecture hosted at the SEI Architecture Technology User Network (SATURN) conference, moderator Rick Kazman noted that on the day of the panel discussion—May 9, 2012— that same search yielded 2,380,000 results. This 30-fold increase stems from various factors, including the steady growth in system complexity, the increased awareness of the importance of software architecture on system quality attributes, and the quality and impact of efforts by the SEI and other groups conducting research and transition activities on software architecture. This blog posting—the first in a series—provides a lightly edited transcription of the presentation of the first panelist, Linda Northrop, director of the SEI’s Research, Technology, & System Solutions (RTSS) Program at the SEI, who provided an overview of the evolution of software architecture work at the SEI during the past twenty years.

Read more...

Using TSP to Architect a New Trading System

Architecture , Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method (ATAM) , Quality Attribute Workshop , Team Software Process (TSP) 2 Comments »

By James McHale,
Senior Member of the Technical Staff,
Software Engineering Process Management

Jim McHale This post is the second installment in a two-part series describing our recent engagement with Bursatec to create a reliable and fast new trading system for Groupo Bolsa Mexicana de Valores (BMV, the Mexican Stock Exchange).  This project combined elements of the SEI’s Architecture Centric Engineering (ACE) method, which requires effective use of software architecture to guide system development, with its Team Software Process (TSP), which is a team-centric approach to developing software that enables organizations to better plan and measure their work and improve software development productivity to gain greater confidence in quality and cost estimates. The first post examined how ACE was applied within the context of TSP. This posting focuses on the development of the system architecture for Bursatec within the TSP framework.

Read more...

Developing Architecture-Centric Engineering Within TSP

Architecture , Architecture Documentation , Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method (ATAM) , Quality Attribute Workshop , Team Software Process (TSP) No Comments »

By Felix Bachmann,
Senior Member of the Technical Staff,
Research, Technology, and System Solutions

Felix BachmannBursatec, the technology arm of Groupo Bolsa Mexicana de Valores (BMV, the Mexican Stock Exchange), recently embarked on a project to replace three existing trading engines with one system developed in house. Given the competitiveness of global financial markets and recent interest in Latin American economies, Bursatec needed a reliable and fast new system that could work ceaselessly throughout the day and handle sharp fluctuations in trading volume. To meet these demands, the SEI suggested combining elements of its Architecture Centric Engineering (ACE) method, which requires effective use of software architecture to guide system development, with its Team Software Process (TSP), which teaches software developers the skills they need to make and track plans and produce high-quality products. This posting—the first in a two-part series—describes the challenges Bursatec faced and outlines how working with the SEI and combining ACE with TSP helped them address those challenges.

Read more...